<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BEWARE: Don’t vote yes, to create another POA Fee.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4kfee.com/against-it/beware-don%e2%80%99t-vote-yes-to-create-another-poa-fee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4kfee.com/against-it/beware-don%e2%80%99t-vote-yes-to-create-another-poa-fee/</link>
	<description>What are your thoughts on the proposed fee?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CAIBC</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/against-it/beware-don%e2%80%99t-vote-yes-to-create-another-poa-fee/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>CAIBC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/against-it/beware-don%e2%80%99t-vote-yes-to-create-another-poa-fee/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Don’t be fooled by the POAB, you are actually voting for a “new” POA fee structure.

The Capital Initiation Fee (CIF) will be an “adjustable-rate” CIF.

As was said:
“Once the Big Canoe property owners create a new fee, the POA Board has the discretion to raise it higher without re-approval of the property owners.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t be fooled by the POAB, you are actually voting for a “new” POA fee structure.</p>
<p>The Capital Initiation Fee (CIF) will be an “adjustable-rate” CIF.</p>
<p>As was said:<br />
“Once the Big Canoe property owners create a new fee, the POA Board has the discretion to raise it higher without re-approval of the property owners.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

