<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Initiation Fee Scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4kfee.com/against-it/initiation-fee-scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4kfee.com/against-it/initiation-fee-scam/</link>
	<description>What are your thoughts on the proposed fee?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alley_Cat</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/against-it/initiation-fee-scam/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Alley_Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/against-it/initiation-fee-scam/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Amen Ron, you articulate what is the simple fact.  The Board sold everyone this lovely package of upgrades for a mere $25/$16+ (home/lot) for 5 years.  This cash flow with a bunch of leverage (loans) stretches the community too thin.  PLain and simple.  It was a disengenuous presentation then not to give people the cold hard truth...'you want this amenity upgrade then write a check for $XXXX.XX and we will pay for it in CASH.

Ron is on a roll, a percentage of sale is also contrary to what the funding is for.  It should be a flat fee.  As Ron stated each proprty has equal access to the amenities in Big Canoe.  How fair is it to TAX someone who has a 400K home more than someone that has a 300K home.  

It is hard to back any of these concoctions prposed by the POA board.  Also I just read the white papers...does the board know what a white paper is in the real world???  We don't need a sales job.

Let's be fair with the new TAX proposals in Big Canoe and Board let's be honest with the people. 

Norton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen Ron, you articulate what is the simple fact.  The Board sold everyone this lovely package of upgrades for a mere $25/$16+ (home/lot) for 5 years.  This cash flow with a bunch of leverage (loans) stretches the community too thin.  PLain and simple.  It was a disengenuous presentation then not to give people the cold hard truth&#8230;&#8217;you want this amenity upgrade then write a check for $XXXX.XX and we will pay for it in CASH.</p>
<p>Ron is on a roll, a percentage of sale is also contrary to what the funding is for.  It should be a flat fee.  As Ron stated each proprty has equal access to the amenities in Big Canoe.  How fair is it to TAX someone who has a 400K home more than someone that has a 300K home.  </p>
<p>It is hard to back any of these concoctions prposed by the POA board.  Also I just read the white papers&#8230;does the board know what a white paper is in the real world???  We don&#8217;t need a sales job.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be fair with the new TAX proposals in Big Canoe and Board let&#8217;s be honest with the people. </p>
<p>Norton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
