<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Smoke Signals (May 2008 Issue) is saying: Who pays the CIF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4kfee.com/against-it/what-the-smoke-signals-may-2008-issue-is-saying-who-pays-the-cif/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4kfee.com/against-it/what-the-smoke-signals-may-2008-issue-is-saying-who-pays-the-cif/</link>
	<description>What are your thoughts on the proposed fee?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thank you</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/against-it/what-the-smoke-signals-may-2008-issue-is-saying-who-pays-the-cif/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Thank you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/against-it/what-the-smoke-signals-may-2008-issue-is-saying-who-pays-the-cif/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Exit Tax?

With all of the disgruntled residents leaving Big Canoe, we will have more money to build beautiful “resort” facilities.

Let’s call it the: “Thank-you for leaving tax.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exit Tax?</p>
<p>With all of the disgruntled residents leaving Big Canoe, we will have more money to build beautiful “resort” facilities.</p>
<p>Let’s call it the: “Thank-you for leaving tax.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaving</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/against-it/what-the-smoke-signals-may-2008-issue-is-saying-who-pays-the-cif/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/against-it/what-the-smoke-signals-may-2008-issue-is-saying-who-pays-the-cif/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I was disappointed with the columnist’s comment:

“You and I have been paying our dues and assessments over the years toward building the first-class amenities we enjoy in our community today. It's only fair that newcomers pay a catch-up entry fee when passing through the gates.” 

Yes, it would be fair if the newcomers paid the CIF, but as the seller, I will pay the CIF.

And yes, I did pay for the existing facilities, and upon leaving Big Canoe and paying the CIF, I will be paying for the facilities that will be built after I leave Big Canoe. 

Where is “It's only fair” in my situation? Please, get real!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was disappointed with the columnist’s comment:</p>
<p>“You and I have been paying our dues and assessments over the years toward building the first-class amenities we enjoy in our community today. It&#8217;s only fair that newcomers pay a catch-up entry fee when passing through the gates.” </p>
<p>Yes, it would be fair if the newcomers paid the CIF, but as the seller, I will pay the CIF.</p>
<p>And yes, I did pay for the existing facilities, and upon leaving Big Canoe and paying the CIF, I will be paying for the facilities that will be built after I leave Big Canoe. </p>
<p>Where is “It&#8217;s only fair” in my situation? Please, get real!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Wyeth</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/against-it/what-the-smoke-signals-may-2008-issue-is-saying-who-pays-the-cif/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wyeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/against-it/what-the-smoke-signals-may-2008-issue-is-saying-who-pays-the-cif/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Some people came to Big Canoe before I did in
1994 and I didn't have to pay a "catch-up fee" as Bennet feels is only fair. I am for the Capital reserve Fund but against the so-called
"Buyer pays" baloney. The Seller will end up on
the short of this! I believe all residents should pay and propose that payment be on assessed valuation of property per county tax.
At 5 mills rate a $300,000 assessed valuation
would be $ 150 a year( Pickens County values alone in Big Canoe at $598,000,000 would collect $299,000 a year).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people came to Big Canoe before I did in<br />
1994 and I didn&#8217;t have to pay a &#8220;catch-up fee&#8221; as Bennet feels is only fair. I am for the Capital reserve Fund but against the so-called<br />
&#8220;Buyer pays&#8221; baloney. The Seller will end up on<br />
the short of this! I believe all residents should pay and propose that payment be on assessed valuation of property per county tax.<br />
At 5 mills rate a $300,000 assessed valuation<br />
would be $ 150 a year( Pickens County values alone in Big Canoe at $598,000,000 would collect $299,000 a year).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
