<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An analysis of the LTFC/POAB White Paper - “FAQs for the CIF - Number II”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>What are your thoughts on the proposed fee?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Looking Eye</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Taylor.

You said that the Petit Crest Time Shares have 70 votes. Have many votes do the other Time Share properties have?

The LTFC was asked for a total and never gave an answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Taylor.</p>
<p>You said that the Petit Crest Time Shares have 70 votes. Have many votes do the other Time Share properties have?</p>
<p>The LTFC was asked for a total and never gave an answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>I talked to RAL, the resort managment company for Petit Crest.  Petit Crest has 2 votes for each property, 70 votes total.  Any vote made will be according to the Petit Crest owners board.

Time Shares sell 'weeks', and not the whole property.  My understanding is that the current market is less than 2K per week.  A 1% fee would yield $20 per week sold.

I don't know the cost of administration for BC, but I can expect that administration cost would be higher than a $20 fee.

Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I talked to RAL, the resort managment company for Petit Crest.  Petit Crest has 2 votes for each property, 70 votes total.  Any vote made will be according to the Petit Crest owners board.</p>
<p>Time Shares sell &#8216;weeks&#8217;, and not the whole property.  My understanding is that the current market is less than 2K per week.  A 1% fee would yield $20 per week sold.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know the cost of administration for BC, but I can expect that administration cost would be higher than a $20 fee.</p>
<p>Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaving</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>This question was not answered in Part 2 by the LTFC; would they please answer it here?

“For the homeowners who want to bail out of Big Canoe's financial problems, will the LTFC/POA Board give each of these property owners a one-year no-CIF grace period in which to sell their homes?”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question was not answered in Part 2 by the LTFC; would they please answer it here?</p>
<p>“For the homeowners who want to bail out of Big Canoe&#8217;s financial problems, will the LTFC/POA Board give each of these property owners a one-year no-CIF grace period in which to sell their homes?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking Eye</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Instead of a CIF, if you did a “monthly assessment” fee increase, wouldn’t the Time Share owners be required to pay for their share of the capital improvements?

And by the way, are the Time Share owners paying the current special assessment?

Sorry, but I must ask: Is this how you buy votes/elections at Big Canoe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of a CIF, if you did a “monthly assessment” fee increase, wouldn’t the Time Share owners be required to pay for their share of the capital improvements?</p>
<p>And by the way, are the Time Share owners paying the current special assessment?</p>
<p>Sorry, but I must ask: Is this how you buy votes/elections at Big Canoe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-analysis-of-the-ltfcpoab-white-paper-%e2%80%9cfaqs-for-the-cif-number-ii%e2%80%9d/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>How is voting currently handled for timeshares on any matter?  This is a good point that is brought up.  If time share owners are not paying a fee / being taxed, should they have a voice in how things are run?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is voting currently handled for timeshares on any matter?  This is a good point that is brought up.  If time share owners are not paying a fee / being taxed, should they have a voice in how things are run?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
