Comments on: Like the fund idea, afraid of the lack of controls http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/like-the-fund-idea-afraid-of-the-lack-of-controls/ What are your thoughts on the proposed fee? Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:36:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: admin http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/like-the-fund-idea-afraid-of-the-lack-of-controls/#comment-77 admin Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:44:38 +0000 http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/like-the-fund-idea-afraid-of-the-lack-of-controls/#comment-77 Just to clarify, Bob Crouch agreed to pass along the questions from http://4kfee.com to the LTFC. Also, while I understand that some residents are disgruntled, I would kindly ask that there is no shaming or flaming of anyone on this site. If you've got a complaint, by all means register it, just please register is respectfully. Last, thanks for the good comments! Just to clarify, Bob Crouch agreed to pass along the questions from http://4kfee.com to the LTFC. Also, while I understand that some residents are disgruntled, I would kindly ask that there is no shaming or flaming of anyone on this site. If you’ve got a complaint, by all means register it, just please register is respectfully. Last, thanks for the good comments!

]]> By: Big Mac http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/like-the-fund-idea-afraid-of-the-lack-of-controls/#comment-76 Big Mac Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:32:14 +0000 http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/like-the-fund-idea-afraid-of-the-lack-of-controls/#comment-76 I agree with you. But until all of the questions on this Web site are answered, my vote will be an absolute NO. The POA Board President Bob Crouch promised the users of this Web site that he would answer the property owners’ questions posted here. Should we have believed him? Answering questions from disgruntled property owners is not how this board plays the game. We are dealing with a corporation board, not an association board; we have a Big Canoe POC, not a POA. The Big Canoe POC will operate under their rules as a corporation, and not ours as an association. They will engage us on their grounds, not ours. Since the Big Canoe POC won’t address major community issues on their very own Forum, why should anyone think that they would respond to this open Internet Forum? As POA Board Director John Seferian said in his White Paper No. 1, the communication process for informing the property owners about the CIF will be 5 “white papers” between now and the 4/26 Town Hall meeting. In addition, a second set of FAQs will be published and a “hot line” established. -- Note that there is no timetable given for the second set of FAQs or that they will answer any or all of the questions from this web site. -- As I have learned in the past, a corporate board's attorney will always suggest that his client delay answering the questions until the very last moment to minimize the impact of any of their answers (don't plan to see answers to “all” of the questions listed on the Web site anytime soon, if at all). Again, as I have pointed out on many occasions to others, at Big Canoe, we are dealing with a corporation - a POC not a POA. It is a shame, but only by shaming the POC Board Directors in a public forum, will you even have a small possibility of getting answers to important questions (truthful or otherwise). Why not add this Web site’s Internet address to the Big Canoe POA Forum? All Big Canoe property owners should have access to its CIF questions. I agree with you. But until all of the questions on this Web site are answered, my vote will be an absolute NO.

The POA Board President Bob Crouch promised the users of this Web site that he would answer the property owners’ questions posted here. Should we have believed him?

Answering questions from disgruntled property owners is not how this board plays the game. We are dealing with a corporation board, not an association board; we have a Big Canoe POC, not a POA.

The Big Canoe POC will operate under their rules as a corporation, and not ours as an association. They will engage us on their grounds, not ours.

Since the Big Canoe POC won’t address major community issues on their very own Forum, why should anyone think that they would respond to this open Internet Forum?

As POA Board Director John Seferian said in his White Paper No. 1, the communication process for informing the property owners about the CIF will be 5 “white papers” between now and the 4/26 Town Hall meeting. In addition, a second set of FAQs will be published and a “hot line” established.
– Note that there is no timetable given for the second set of FAQs or that they will answer any or all of the questions from this web site. –

As I have learned in the past, a corporate board’s attorney will always suggest that his client delay answering the questions until the very last moment to minimize the impact of any of their answers (don’t plan to see answers to “all” of the questions listed on the Web site anytime soon, if at all).

Again, as I have pointed out on many occasions to others, at Big Canoe, we are dealing with a corporation - a POC not a POA.

It is a shame, but only by shaming the POC Board Directors in a public forum, will you even have a small possibility of getting answers to important questions (truthful or otherwise).

Why not add this Web site’s Internet address to the Big Canoe POA Forum? All Big Canoe property owners should have access to its CIF questions.

]]>